Franco L A (2006) 'Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: a conceptual development' in Journal of the Operational
Research Society, Vol 57, pp 813-21.
Yankelovich D (1999). The Magic of Dialogue: Turning Conflict into Cooperation. Simon and Schuster: New York.
McDonald, Bammer & Deane (2009) Research Integration Using Dialogue Methods.
http://epress.anu.edu.au/dialogue_methods/pdf_instructions.html
Bammer G (2009) Dialogue Methods for Research Integration: The Particular and The General
http://www.transdisciplinarity.ch/e/conference/international/2009/presentations/Bammer.pdf
WHAT IS RESEARCH INTEGRATION?
How does dialogue fit into this emerging discipline?
Research integration is the process of improving the understanding of real-world problems by synthesizing relevant knowledge from diverse disciplines and stakeholders. It is integration in the context of research, integration by researchers, and integration as a research activity in its own right.
It requires appreciation of different epistemologies (that is, the variety of different ways in which we can come to know ‘something’), as well as different underlying values, interests, world views, and so on. A more comprehensive understanding of real-world problems involves teasing out such differences and finding ways to synthesize them. The role of a research integrator is to identify, gather, combine and analyze relevant disciplinary and stakeholder knowledge in a way that clarifies the diverse aspects of a problem, as well as the relationships and interconnectionsamong them. The aim is to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the problem.
How do various types of dialogue fit in?
One key set of methods for gathering and combining such diverse perspectives builds on various techniques of dialogue. Dialogue? ....
...jointly create meaning and shared understanding through conversation. -- L A Franco
Once the group starts to become larger, however, structuring the conversation becomes essential for different understandings to be effectively shared and brought together. Many methods for organizing conversation have been developed, but they are not all dialogue (debate is an example) or relevant to research integration.
Two broad classes of dialogue methods for research integration:
- Dialogue methods for understanding a problem broadly:
- Consensus Conference
- Consensus Development Panel
- Delphi Technique
- Future Search Conference
- Most Significant Change Technique
- Nominal Group Technique
- Open Space Technology
- Scenario Planning
- Soft Systems Methodology
- Dialogue methods for understanding particular aspects of a problem, integrating visions, world views, interests, and values:
- Appreciative Inquiry
- Strategic Assumption Surfacing and Testings
- Principled Negotiation
- Ethical Matrix
Goals & Objectives: We intend to develop a sets of processes and modules to support facilitators and consultants as they guide their clients through those dialogue methods listed above in an asynchronous, online environment.